Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 08:28:53 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison,
 take page offline
Message-ID: <2023051938-pelvis-stucco-0c49@gregkh>
References: <20221021200120.175753-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
 <20221031201029.102123-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
 <20221031201029.102123-3-tony.luck@intel.com>
 <71cdf8cc-a640-ec06-fca5-ed4d948c4880@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <71cdf8cc-a640-ec06-fca5-ed4d948c4880@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:49:44PM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
> Hi, Tony, Greg,
> 
> Does it make sense to include this patch series in the
> 5.15.y LTS kernel?  I just checked: it's not in 5.15.112.

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>