Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-431-g1d6a3ebb56-fm-20230511.001-g1d6a3ebb
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <9aaed1c3-9a7d-4348-b15f-2bb9be654bef@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a78d9dcd-0bc1-7e98-a8f1-e5d6cd0c09a3@intel.com>
References: <20230516193549.544673-1-arnd@kernel.org>
 <a78d9dcd-0bc1-7e98-a8f1-e5d6cd0c09a3@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 14:09:11 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To:     "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org
Cc:     "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
        "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware)" <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>,
        "Alexey Makhalov" <amakhalov@vmware.com>,
        "VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers" <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@infradead.org>,
        "Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] x86: address -Wmissing-prototype warnings
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 18, 2023, at 23:56, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/16/23 12:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> 
>> All of the warnings have to be addressed in some form before the warning
>> can be enabled by default.
>
> I picked up the ones that were blatantly obvious, but left out 03, 04,
> 10, 12 and 19 for the moment.

Ok, thanks!

I've already sent a fixed version of patch 10, let me know if you
need anything else for the other ones.

> BTW, I think the i386 allyesconfig is getting pretty lightly tested
> these days.  I think you and I hit the same mlx4 __bad_copy_from()
> compile issue.

I did all my testing on randconfig builds, so I probably caught a lot
of the more obscure corner cases, but it doesn't always hit everything
that is in allyesconfig/allmodconfig.

       Arnd