DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=ZNXIZlE2neYIZDVDvOp8VLtXN7fqERMN0fNjR9ZTMPEYO4mHp1t5104Z15rgQzt+1mD6ag2ppW4dQAjKHFXbjZfvixxp161eD/juYCy3eJAQ3tgXesmuQufYW4jrRO218+a3K6lHObhgUuN8v7w7aOwOHyd2lkuRDKsOUIBbNis=
Message-ID: <84144f020710081031m30600714q70b8071920eea4c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:31:37 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <25555.1191864285@lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <25555.1191864285@lwn.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 810
Lines: 19

Hi Jonathan,

On 10/8/07, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> As I was trying to sleep last night, it occurred to me that what we
> might need is an equivalent of the DCO for the Reviewed-by tag.  To that
> end, I dedicated a few minutes of my life to the following bit of text.
> It's really just meant to be a starting point for the discussion.  Is
> the following something close to what we understand Reviewed-by to mean?

[snip]

Looks good but how is this different from the Acked-by tag we are already using?

                                     Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/