Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reply-To: casey@schaufler-ca.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
       "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
       James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
       linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <m11wc5a5gp.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-ID: <868078.46629.qm@web36612.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 911
Lines: 23


--- "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:

> It really seems to me that the LSM as currently structured creates
> a large barrier to entry for people who have just this little thing
> they want to do that is not possible with any existing security
> module.

I honestly think that the barrier has been more political
in nature than technical. I don't know how long you've been
watching, but no attempt to get an LSM upstream has escaped
exagerated cricism from certain factions. Only someone who wants
to get cut to metaphorical ribbons would submit a little LSM.
Maybe that will get better now. I sure hope so.


Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/