Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 20 May 2023 10:46:45 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc/unistd: add syscall()
Message-ID: <20230520084645.GB27206@1wt.eu>
References: <20230517-nolibc-syscall-v1-1-af232d84577a@weissschuh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230517-nolibc-syscall-v1-1-af232d84577a@weissschuh.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 09:58:57AM +0200, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> syscall() is used by "normal" libcs to allow users to directly call
> syscalls.
> By having the same syntax inside nolibc users can more easily write code
> that works with different libcs.
> 
> The macro logic is adapted from systemtaps STAP_PROBEV() macro that is
> released in the public domain / CC0.

Well done! And now queued, thanks Thomas!
Willy