Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp615770rwd; Sat, 20 May 2023 03:51:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4LvNqENCU/5vmuolfcxrifNlwfhtUDuLlrYlcsypRVvoufU14Ijb3fuQuD7NOLJJquJhSa X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec90:b0:1aa:ffa9:9260 with SMTP id x16-20020a170902ec9000b001aaffa99260mr7348544plg.7.1684579919093; Sat, 20 May 2023 03:51:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684579919; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QNVrIzadpqEmnYp8XF3EuYUwCizf8mepd1iMQXqVZTRqE79cPFXDHmS9jMAdFtad3t A0EBJxmA0SJ2F01leJ8BzftP0hTSjg/OiRN5d9KokQyPyRJSNn53Pc4MloeQXhl5LuM2 14jF0A1/kE3bJTP6bgX5DhX+B+FbsF7HjWunrYZC7l1mjHvoW5f12vfQe6iE7egMhB/U nZ686dpryC3DGkpi0d8jKZOHbAymhQCkP+QgVODfzcApco3GW0f1wlPpBe65FU2ST1RO 10YQC4R6ammjTQW7wGh8FWz2aaeJszlOXAniyD7yTJxL1VL4asbMpnJ8i/SZkjtmA54E Yibw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=N03l6KYv0EVsPpDm9/Xgt94/sy6qBfjYzpMoCfywBsw=; b=MijjDyoFZwUB5caTYmIsRL8J1qYEH4Vj5n2xLAqlHl7mfrz1koxmEilw3mTz/9aRci nKWlX5hUdeNFrKxY4A5B4xdBoF7GwZ7GVkHVwNi/n7IJGgLsss5uZeORaOudWRB2zG6F c5UVFDp9CSDdflEoUu08QGn07hevq9fq9g9AAs1GDeXXLkWylQ763nqc8YokEuwUgRFp HrskqA1wNnid5ySdQD4br4xm7n1hh/C3hM86ZVQtMNCtEoH+bIpyd0jdkoGkGEMusFt4 A86YtFHCEWVXJptkFhPw3MMV4UpN3G7UvTasLwg6y/1znHhCVvYHvHsRpPQ2Xr5fxO4f ygQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gc19-20020a17090b311300b00252914cd0c3si3374132pjb.23.2023.05.20.03.51.44; Sat, 20 May 2023 03:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231329AbjETKVL (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 20 May 2023 06:21:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57198 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230333AbjETKVK (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2023 06:21:10 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262E7189 for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 03:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 34KAKMGF027329; Sat, 20 May 2023 12:20:22 +0200 Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 12:20:22 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Zhangjin Wu Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@rivosinc.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, paulmck@kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/nolibc: riscv: Fix up load/store instructions for rv32 Message-ID: <20230520102022.GA27326@1wt.eu> References: <20230520093307.GA27287@1wt.eu> <20230520100510.31605-1-falcon@tinylab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230520100510.31605-1-falcon@tinylab.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 06:05:10PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 05:11:44PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > > Hi, Willy > > > > > > This is a full commit message for this patch: > > > > > > When compile for rv32, we got such error: > > > > > > --- > > > > > > nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/arch.h:190: Error: unrecognized opcode `ld a4,0(a3)' > > > nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/arch.h:194: Error: unrecognized opcode `sd a3,%lo(_auxv)(a4)' > > > nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/arch.h:196: Error: unrecognized opcode `sd a2,%lo(environ)(a3)' > > > > > > Refer to arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h and add REG_L/REG_S macros here to let > > > rv32 use its own lw/sw instructions. > > > > > > --- > > > > That's fine, thank you! > > > > > I will send a new version with the above full message for you, wait for a > > > while, very sorry ;-) > > > > Don't waste your time resending, I can perfectly take that one and > > put it into the series. > > > > Thanks very much, just found the first `---` is in the wrong line, please > remove the '---' lines manually ;-) > > When compile nolibc application for rv32, we got such errors: > > nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/arch.h:190: Error: unrecognized opcode `ld a4,0(a3)' > nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/arch.h:194: Error: unrecognized opcode `sd a3,%lo(_auxv)(a4)' > nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/arch.h:196: Error: unrecognized opcode `sd a2,%lo(environ)(a3)' > > Refer to arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h and add REG_L/REG_S macros here to let > rv32 uses its own lw/sw instructions. > > Btw, I wrote some new comments for the 2nd __NR_lseek patch, it is: > > riscv uses the generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h, it has code > like this: > > #if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && !defined(__SYSCALL_COMPAT) > #define __NR_lseek __NR3264_lseek > #else > #define __NR_llseek __NR3264_lseek > #endif > > There is no __NR_lseek for rv32, use __NR_llseek instead. > > This code is based on sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lseek.c of glibc. Many thanks, it's indeed better this way. > The preceeding 4 white spaces are not required for real commit messages. Sure ;-) Thanks willy