Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 21 May 2023 12:08:18 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] tools/nolibc: autodetect stackprotector availability
 from compiler
Message-ID: <20230521100818.GA29408@1wt.eu>
References: <20230521-nolibc-automatic-stack-protector-v1-0-dad6c80c51c1@weissschuh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230521-nolibc-automatic-stack-protector-v1-0-dad6c80c51c1@weissschuh.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Hi Thomas,

On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> As suggested by Willy it is possible to detect the availability of
> stackprotector via preprocessor defines.
> Make use of that to simplify the code and interface of nolibc.

I have just had a quick glance over it and not tested it yet, but
overall I really like it, thank you! I'll try to give you some
feedback today (or simply merge it).

Willy