Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230520190856.34720-1-boerge.struempfel@gmail.com>
 <20230520190856.34720-5-boerge.struempfel@gmail.com> <CAHp75VeR724n7C8hXs_7+TfvXANPZ7man3Znns8O+mBc113fYw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeR724n7C8hXs_7+TfvXANPZ7man3Znns8O+mBc113fYw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?QsO2cmdlIFN0csO8bXBmZWw=?= <boerge.struempfel@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 May 2023 13:35:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEktqcv3NEZKmxBdCjf29JbSbFfTzZB9p0yXF+btVrNYO5XU4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] spi: spidev_test Add three missing spi mode bits
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     bstruempfel@ultratronik.de, festevam@gmail.com,
        amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com, broonie@kernel.org,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Am So., 21. Mai 2023 um 11:00 Uhr schrieb Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>:
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 10:09=E2=80=AFPM Boerge Struempfel
> <boerge.struempfel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Added the three missing spi mode bits SPI_3WIRE_HIZ, SPI_RX_CPHA_FLIP,
> > and SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW. Due to the length of the new options, the
> > indentation of the options in the help message was also adjusted for al=
l
> > other options.
>
> Actually since you are touching all of them in the user-visible
> output, you may also reshuffle them to be grouped logically. I'm not
> sure if the switch-case ordering would be nice to have shuffled as
> well. If so, in this case it might be better to have it as a
> preparatory patch before you adding new options (and hence take care
> of indentation in the first patch). That said, just think about it,
> I'm not insisting.
>

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried coming up with a logical way of
ordering, but I am having some difficulties deciding. What do you
think of the following order?

general device settings
" -D --device device to use (default /dev/spidev1.1)\n"
" -s --speed max speed (Hz)\n"
" -d --delay delay (usec)\n"
" -l --loop loopback\n"

spi mode
" -H --cpha clock phase\n"
" -O --cpol clock polarity\n"
" -F --rx-cpha-flip flip CPHA on Rx only xfer\n"

number of wires for transmission
" -2 --dual dual transfer\n"
" -4 --quad quad transfer\n"
" -8 --octal octal transfer\n"
" -3 --3wire SI/SO signals shared\n"
" -Z --3wire-hiz high impedance turnaround\n"

additional parameters
" -b --bpw bits per word\n"
" -L --lsb least significant bit first\n"
" -C --cs-high chip select active high\n"
" -N --no-cs no chip select\n"
" -R --ready slave pulls low to pause\n"
" -M --mosi-idle-low leave mosi line low when idle\n"

data
" -i --input input data from a file (e.g. \"test.bin\")\n"
" -o --output output data to a file (e.g. \"results.bin\")\n"
" -p Send data (e.g. \"1234\\xde\\xad\")\n"
" -S --size transfer size\n"
" -I --iter iterations\n");

misc
" -v --verbose Verbose (show tx buffer)\n"

--
Kind regards,
B=C3=B6rge Str=C3=BCmpfel