Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 14:38:39 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
Cc:     hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net,
        edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se, horatiu.vultur@microchip.com,
        Woojung.Huh@microchip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com,
        Thorsten.Kummermehr@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: update LAN867x
 PHY supported revision number
Message-ID: <f417ba86-4d48-44e9-8bf0-aa15c466a9f2@lunn.ch>
References: <20230522113331.36872-1-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
 <20230522113331.36872-4-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230522113331.36872-4-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk

> -#define PHY_ID_LAN867X 0x0007C160
> +#define PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVB1 0x0007C162

>  static struct phy_driver microchip_t1s_driver[] = {
>  	{
> -		PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_LAN867X),
> -		.name               = "LAN867X",
> +		PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVB1),
> +		.name               = "LAN867X Rev.B1",
>  		.features           = PHY_BASIC_T1S_P2MP_FEATURES,
> -		.config_init        = lan867x_config_init,
> +		.config_init        = lan867x_revb1_config_init,
>  		.read_status        = lan867x_read_status,
>  		.get_plca_cfg	    = genphy_c45_plca_get_cfg,
>  		.set_plca_cfg	    = genphy_c45_plca_set_cfg,
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct phy_driver microchip_t1s_driver[] = {
>  module_phy_driver(microchip_t1s_driver);
>  
>  static struct mdio_device_id __maybe_unused tbl[] = {
> -	{ PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_LAN867X) },
> +	{ PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVB1) },
>  	{ }
>  };

Maybe i asked this last time...

What versions actually exist? The old entry would match 0x0007C16X, so
0x0007C160 and 0x0007C161, 0x0007C162, if those actually exist. Now
you are narrowing it down to just 0x0007C162.

It would be good to comment on this in the commit message, that
0x0007C160 and 0x0007C161 never escaped the testing facility and hence
don't need to be supported.

	Andrew