Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 16:00:57 +0200
From:   David Epping <david.epping@missinglinkelectronics.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: phy: mscc: enable VSC8501/2 RGMII RX clock
Message-ID: <20230522140057.GB18381@nucnuc.mle>
References: <20230520160603.32458-1-david.epping@missinglinkelectronics.com>
 <20230520160603.32458-4-david.epping@missinglinkelectronics.com>
 <20230521134356.ar3itavhdypnvasc@skbuf>
 <20230521161650.GC2208@nucnuc.mle>
 <20230522095833.otk2nv24plmvarpt@skbuf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230522095833.otk2nv24plmvarpt@skbuf>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:58:33PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> If you still prefer to write twice in a row to the same paged register
> instead of combining the changes, then fine by me, it's not a huge deal.

Since the clock enablement now happens in all modes the existing rgmii
function name seems misleading to me. Also we don't want to enable for
all PHY types, and the differentiation is already available at the
caller. I would thus opt for a separate function and fewer conditional
statements.

Its my first patch re-submission, so sorry for the noob question:
Should I include your "pw-bot: changes-requested" tag with the third
patch? Probably not.
Of course I'll include your tags for patches 1 and 2.