Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: hide unused bpf_patch_call_args
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
        Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>,
        Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230517125617.931437-1-arnd@kernel.org>
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Message-ID: <b5eefaaa-0566-a545-ffbe-e23c51397126@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 16:26:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20230517125617.931437-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 5/17/23 2:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> This function has no callers and no declaration when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
> is enabled:
> 
> kernel/bpf/core.c:2075:6: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_patch_call_args' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 
> Hide the definition as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>   kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 7421487422d4..6f5ede31e471 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@ EVAL4(PROG_NAME_LIST, 416, 448, 480, 512)
>   };
>   #undef PROG_NAME_LIST
>   #define PROG_NAME_LIST(stack_size) PROG_NAME_ARGS(stack_size),
> -static u64 (*interpreters_args[])(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5,
> +static __maybe_unused u64 (*interpreters_args[])(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5,
>   				  const struct bpf_insn *insn) = {

Patch 2 lgtm, small nit above: could you fix up indent?

>   EVAL6(PROG_NAME_LIST, 32, 64, 96, 128, 160, 192)
>   EVAL6(PROG_NAME_LIST, 224, 256, 288, 320, 352, 384)
> @@ -2072,6 +2072,7 @@ EVAL4(PROG_NAME_LIST, 416, 448, 480, 512)
>   };
>   #undef PROG_NAME_LIST
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
>   void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth)
>   {
>   	stack_depth = max_t(u32, stack_depth, 1);
> @@ -2080,6 +2081,7 @@ void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth)
>   		__bpf_call_base_args;
>   	insn->code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS;
>   }
> +#endif
>   
>   #else
>   static unsigned int __bpf_prog_ret0_warn(const void *ctx,

Thanks,
Daniel