Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp3037540rwd; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4/tdlKxf00J5ZBIHwiE4rWlDXEQCYbZBJPSw259PdUxqVsV70VxSkXY3buYVK7g2/WIDix X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:db07:b0:1ae:89a:9e with SMTP id m7-20020a170902db0700b001ae089a009emr13952801plx.61.1684767141398; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684767141; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CNBXKVUjNtGi05q3m/kTBZ5XyZvWNUebdvxz29t+yqmlHn79qmX5BDRKVS4w4CoTMy 8x2y4v3xlcJ16S4AIYCgV8yDG8cd3ahYjtD2BVYDHOXAifw48+rrS28OTK6swC9JWSy5 JUdhvqa9Nbn6FvVnQsIxNw0s1z8KCrsvy2DKlnBfh9RueJjmiqRk8BxjI6dexHe5hfXD du1j6EtPQGJZAPAzB5oba5snZL2sM77WchPuF8VfMwVbIiWoMAk2UlP+jAIMg/ZMIuS2 o4nK/PwAKO8oUzz1s44ruhvveRbNE71yJC656CIfbx/debDtUwDkQUf+4Hiu9RhxVhkl HfEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=rp/Qrm68l2J03P8rfMZjtlO3P8+1z84Z9fhztNlCsMA=; b=XPyt7NtEtkfXkCE7sd754L2xsMGfi4TFD/CIJoIVGAKcpJyEI91s9jbbY1+ljG3a/S gHVE/E5bvl7MC3V9lAio1i51JpvJWHIHPfDf3MxxO5NQTEYTOXBiv0iOIFdbv42t4Nbb MYRrTVhyk7xcULTc8vdFc7+Z8AW89jO/BPS6VuZARtJcj7Zruzhh3hjYtpOURVzlJSoC 0YKtFdx801HkIC2w+e+Au2OAAV6bZHVk6hV9cSGoVJUad7m6jbWh2rxDpaKIRzXaRb61 QAmgAbCzjPf4O6XvCY9zLlBvNllkPlp+9OYVNAwuKxP9OGJN52uuAvot3m4VSDLO83Pn 8qVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1-20020a170902f54100b001aada12d628si3490065plf.585.2023.05.22.07.52.09; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233900AbjEVOmA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 May 2023 10:42:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229761AbjEVOl7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2023 10:41:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6B5B0; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742BD11FB; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.22.146] (unknown [10.57.22.146]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A6163F67D; Mon, 22 May 2023 07:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 15:41:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add basic tracing for uclamp and schedutil Content-Language: en-US To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, delyank@fb.com, qyousef@google.com, qyousef@layalina.io, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM References: <20230509122246.1702397-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <88fcd266-301a-f6e1-cf1c-69c20e74ef35@arm.com> From: Lukasz Luba In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/22/23 15:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:38 PM Lukasz Luba wrote: >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> >> >> On 5/9/23 13:22, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The task scheduler feature: Uclamp, begins to take off. To better understand >>> the dynamics in the task scheduler and CPU frequency requests we need some >>> better tracing. >>> In schedutil (cpufreq governor) we allow to enter the scheduler >>> and make the frequency change. Although, there is some limit in regards to how >>> often this can happen. That min period is provided by the cpufreq driver. >>> Thus, some of the cpufreq requests might be filter out and the frequency won't >>> be changed (hopefuly will be set a bit later). We would like to know about >>> those situations, especially in context of the user-space hints made via >>> Uclamp for particular tasks. >>> This patch set aims to add base for our toolkits and post-processing trace >>> analyzes. >> >>> Changelog: >>> v2: >>> - solved the issue from CI build warning, dropped schedutil.h and re-used >>> the sched.h which is available in build_utility.c where cpufreq_schedutil.c >>> is included >>> - added tag for the last patch 3/3 for the CI robot helping hend >>> - re-based on top of v6.4-rc1 >>> v1: >>> - implementation can be found here [1] >>> >> >> I was going to gently ping you, while I've realized that you >> are not on CC list :( I don't know what happened, my apologies. > > No worries. > >> Shell I resend this patch set so you can have it in a proper way >> in your mailbox? > > Well, for schedutil you should also CC linux-pm (done now), so please resend it. > >> Could you have a look at this, please? > > I could, but if I'm to reply, it will be much more convenient for me > if it is there in my inbox. > Thanks Rafael for instant response. I'll resend it with the proper CC list this time.