Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 15:45:31 -0700
From:   Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
To:     Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc:     peterhuewe@gmx.de, jarkko@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
        hdegoede@redhat.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
        peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        linux@mniewoehner.de, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com,
        lukas@wunner.de, p.rosenberger@kunbus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm, tpm_tis: reuse code in disable_interrupts()
Message-ID: <sjuno2nngrloge53ypxgn36ptbuwr2m3wouxt3nwmatux27pyb@vi5hadhrljgt>
References: <20230522143105.8617-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
 <20230522143105.8617-2-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230522143105.8617-2-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 04:31:05PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
> 
> Avoid code redundancy by shifting part of the code in disable_interrupts()
> into a subfunction and reusing this function in tpm_tis_handle_irq_storm().
> Make sure that in the subfunction the INT_ENABLE register is written with a
> claimed locality even if the caller did not claim it before.
> 
> In the shifted code get rid of the variable "rc" by initializing the
> interrupt mask to zero at variable declaration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>

Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>

> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 458ebf8c2f16..8f4f2cb5520f 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -468,25 +468,32 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +static void __tpm_tis_disable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> +	u32 intmask = 0;
> +
> +	tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality), &intmask);
> +	intmask &= ~TPM_GLOBAL_INT_ENABLE;
> +
> +	tpm_tis_request_locality(chip, 0);
> +	tpm_tis_write32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality), intmask);
> +	tpm_tis_relinquish_locality(chip, 0);
> +
> +	chip->flags &= ~TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
> +}
> +
>  static void disable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
>  	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> -	u32 intmask;
> -	int rc;
>  
>  	if (priv->irq == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality), &intmask);
> -	if (rc < 0)
> -		intmask = 0;
> -
> -	intmask &= ~TPM_GLOBAL_INT_ENABLE;
> -	rc = tpm_tis_write32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality), intmask);
> +	__tpm_tis_disable_interrupts(chip);
>  
>  	devm_free_irq(chip->dev.parent, priv->irq, chip);
>  	priv->irq = 0;
> -	chip->flags &= ~TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -755,20 +762,11 @@ static bool tpm_tis_req_canceled(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 status)
>  static void tpm_tis_handle_irq_storm(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
>  	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> -	int intmask = 0;
>  
>  	dev_err(&chip->dev, HW_ERR
>  		"TPM interrupt storm detected, polling instead\n");
>  
> -	tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality), &intmask);
> -
> -	intmask &= ~TPM_GLOBAL_INT_ENABLE;
> -
> -	tpm_tis_request_locality(chip, 0);
> -	tpm_tis_write32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality), intmask);
> -	tpm_tis_relinquish_locality(chip, 0);
> -
> -	chip->flags &= ~TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
> +	__tpm_tis_disable_interrupts(chip);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We must not call devm_free_irq() from within the interrupt handler,
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>