Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 14:58:31 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc:     jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@meta.com, Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>,
        Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 01/13] scsi: ncr53c8xx: Use default @max_active
 for hostdata->work_q
Message-ID: <ZGwPt4VNs1RhWpvn@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20230509015032.3768622-1-tj@kernel.org>
 <20230509015032.3768622-2-tj@kernel.org>
 <ZGmGZxYmN0En7wAB@slm.duckdns.org>
 <yq1v8gkm3aq.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yq1v8gkm3aq.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 06:06:56PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Hi Tejun!
> 
> > Subject: scsi: ncr53c8xx: Use default @max_active for hostdata->work_q
> >
> > hostdata->work_q only hosts a single work item, hostdata->main_task, and
> > thus doesn't need explicit concurrency limit. Let's use the default
> > @max_active. This doesn't cost anything and clearly expresses that
> > @max_active doesn't matter.
> 
> > It's not a must but it'd be great if I can route this through the workqueue
> > tree so that it can go together with other related and followup cleanups.
> 
> As Finn pointed out, please make sure it's tagged NCR5380: instead of
> ncr53c8xx:. Otherwise OK.
> 
> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

Will update and apply to wq/for-6.5-cleanup-ordered.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun