Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755603AbXJIR7S (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:59:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752659AbXJIR7F (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:59:05 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:50198 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751459AbXJIR7E (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:59:04 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,249,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="167973222" Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:53:57 -0700 From: Kristen Carlson Accardi To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] ata: libata: add per device private data Message-Id: <20071009105357.23e95e41.kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <47025EB2.6010606@pobox.com> References: <20070924162314.408ece21.kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> <47025EB2.6010606@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1849 Lines: 51 Sorry for the delay in responding, I was on vacation. On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:07:30 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > > Allow host controllers to store private data per device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi > > > > --- > > include/linux/libata.h | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > Index: libata-dev/include/linux/libata.h > > =================================================================== > > --- libata-dev.orig/include/linux/libata.h 2007-09-24 16:13:33.000000000 -0700 > > +++ libata-dev/include/linux/libata.h 2007-09-24 16:15:24.000000000 -0700 > > @@ -474,6 +474,9 @@ struct ata_device { > > /* error history */ > > struct ata_ering ering; > > int spdn_cnt; > > + > > + /* controller driver per device private data */ > > + void *private_data; > > I don't have any objections to this per se... a lot of other subsystems > do this too, and I can certainly see a potential need. > > But what about object lifetimes? If a controller is hot-unplugged, does > anyone need notification to destroy dynamic objects, or does controller > cleanup take care of that? If a device is unplugged, where should a > controller driver do its ->private_data cleanup? > > This is /not/ a NAK, just a request to make clear the lifetime rules and > procedures... > > Jeff > I'll do this - and meanwhile go ahead and ignore this patch. I've decided to submit it as part of a series where I actually use the private data, so we can review it in context. Thanks, Kristen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/