Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755972AbXJISlm (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:41:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751889AbXJISle (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:41:34 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:7309 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753250AbXJISld (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:41:33 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,249,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="295494183" Message-ID: <470BCB4D.8090307@intel.com> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:41:17 -0700 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lennart Sorensen CC: Pavel Machek , Arjan van de Ven , kernel list Subject: Re: gigabit ethernet power consumption References: <20071008220720.GF3484@elf.ucw.cz> <470AAFD7.9060002@intel.com> <20071009182857.GF4003@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <20071009182857.GF4003@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2007 18:41:31.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[02CF3F30:01C80AA4] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1808 Lines: 35 Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:31:51PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: >> you most certainly want to do this in userspace I think. >> >> One of the biggest problems is that link negotiation can take a significant amount >> of time, well over several seconds (1 to 3 seconds typical) with gigabit, and >> having your ethernet connection go offline for 3 seconds may not be the desired >> effect for when you want to get more bandwidth in the first place. >> >> However, when a laptop is in battery mode, switching down from gigabit to 100mbit >> makes a lot more sense, so this is something I would recommend. This can be as >> easy as changing the advertisement mask of the interface and renegotiating the >> link. Userspace could handle that very easily. > > Now if you were trying to transfer a lot of data to the laptop, would it > be more power efficient to do it at gigabit speeds so you can finish > sooner and shut down the machine entirely, or to slow to 100mbit and > take longer to do it, and hence spend more time powering the cpu and > ram? my suspicion is that the cost of switching is much higher than what you would consume running at 100mbit, even if the amount of data is quite large. going offline to renegotiate the link would already cost you 3W typically. I definately think that userspace is the right field to solve this problem: let the users decide how to use the available power on their sytems through a decent power profile tool (perhaps gnome-power-manager or something like that). This way the user can choose. Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/