Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <058e2e0f-70b4-a506-3ada-2578b99e9163@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 10:07:27 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm, tpm_tis: Handle interrupt storm
Content-Language: en-US
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a9ter_Ujfalusi?= <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
To:     Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
        jarkko@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca
Cc:     jsnitsel@redhat.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,
        lkp@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux@mniewoehner.de,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com, lukas@wunner.de, p.rosenberger@kunbus.com
References: <20230522143105.8617-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
 <c772bcdf-8256-2682-857c-9a6d344606d0@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <c772bcdf-8256-2682-857c-9a6d344606d0@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 23/05/2023 09:48, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>  static void tpm_tis_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> @@ -804,6 +857,15 @@ static void tpm_tis_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>>  		chip->flags &= ~TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void tpm_tis_free_irq_func(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = container_of(work, typeof(*priv), free_irq_work);
>> +	struct tpm_chip *chip = priv->chip;
>> +
>> +	devm_free_irq(chip->dev.parent, priv->irq, chip);
>> +	priv->irq = 0;
> 
> Should disable_interrupts() be called instead (with the locality
> request/relinquish)?
> 
> Is there a chance of a race or is a race matters?

Nevermind this comment, it is good.

-- 
Péter