Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230517124201.441634-1-imagedong@tencent.com>
 <20230517124201.441634-4-imagedong@tencent.com> <CANn89iKLf=V664AsUYC52h_q-xjEq9xC3KqTq8q+t262T91qVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADxym3a0gmzmD3Vwu_shoJnAHm-xjD5tJRuKwTvAXnVk_H55AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVnQynZ67511+cKF=hyiaLx5-fqPGGmpyJ-5Lk6ge-ivmAf-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADxym3ZiyYK7Vyz05qLv8jOPmNZXXepCsTbZxdkhSQxRx0cdSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVnQy=JQkVGRsbL0u=-oZSpdaFBpz907yX24p3uUu2pMhUjGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADxym3awe-c29C-e1Y+efepLdpFWrG520ezJO1EjJ5C3arq6Eg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVnQyk2y68HKScad4W2jOy9uqe7TTCyY-StwdLWFPJhXU+CUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADxym3bbGkOv4dwATp6wT0KA4ZPiPGfxvqvYtEzF45GJDe=RXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADVnQymzzZ9m30-1ZA+muvmt-bjaebtMT0Bh8Wp5vXZuYifONQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQymzzZ9m30-1ZA+muvmt-bjaebtMT0Bh8Wp5vXZuYifONQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 12:26:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CANn89i+K1vo=suwPR43MHeRera513sof7Sz8Qz2tGS3WfWW=OA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: tcp: handle window shrink properly
To:     Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc:     Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>, kuba@kernel.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 5:04=E2=80=AFPM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com=
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 10:55=E2=80=AFPM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gm=
ail.com> wrote:
>
> > BTW, a previous patch has explained the need to
> > support window shrink, which should satisfy the RFC
> > of TCP protocol:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230308053353.675086-1-mfreemon@cloudfl=
are.com/
>
> Let's see what Eric thinks about that patch.

I have not received a copy of the patch, so I will not comment on it.