Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756024AbXJIVFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:05:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754711AbXJIVFd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:05:33 -0400 Received: from smtp124.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.97]:39053 "HELO smtp124.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754560AbXJIVFd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:05:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=3ujcQvaqIIcCeXEt6H42DZ5ynYEq/CrnrUQYLMKCVhHQVtctb1lxjqTlyK0OpJIV+zG32o/jb+wb02rg7ziHjctUGR45hRuZAHEbAykcHNbHLzw5PmawFvlqz54gf4SXqyWXKWfLy+dJ76roQ2z9tC5kgY3tbxyeWFNd3FgfbcI= ; X-YMail-OSG: F9aLlkIVM1l.QORf9In9dtvJEYT0YigGcoPP8yYCnUynU4DF Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:05:34 -0700 From: David Brownell To: greg@kroah.com, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: OHCI root_port_reset() deadly loop... Cc: linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20071009043643.773CC23715F@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <20071008.214408.98397070.davem@davemloft.net> <20071009163827.E7DB310B535@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <20071009.134116.63997473.davem@davemloft.net> <20071009204642.GA11575@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20071009204642.GA11575@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20071009210534.E918F236A37@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 925 Lines: 28 > > > > > What values do you see for "portstat"? > > > > > > > > 0x111 > > > > > > That's unfortunately useless ... PPS, PRS, CCS (meaning powered, > > > resetting, connected). In short, there is *no* indication from > > > the OHCI hardware that a disconnect happened. > > > > But it's an excellent example of why my patch is mandatory. I never disagreed that some patch for that issue was needed. > I agree. David Brownell, unless you strongly object, I'll take David > Miller's patch and add it to my tree. > > And if you do object, can you respond to the objection with a version of > the patch that you would accept? :) I'll send some version with a signoff. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/