Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     perex@perex.cz, Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     tiwai@suse.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com,
        lgirdwood@gmail.com, peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com,
        yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
        daniel.baluta@nxp.com, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com,
        sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230516081116.71370-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
References: <20230516081116.71370-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Fix an unsigned
 comparison which can never be negative
Message-Id: <168487140577.278276.4105417647413959490.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 20:50:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:11:16 +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> The return value from the call to sof_ipc4_get_valid_bits() is int.
> However, the return value is being assigned to an unsigned
> int variable 'out_ref_valid_bits', so making it an int.
> 
> Eliminate the following warning:
> ./sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c:1537:6-24: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: out_ref_valid_bits < 0
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Fix an unsigned comparison which can never be negative
      commit: fcbc3aaccfd57c7e71eac36bf1a8f063f19ceefa

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark