Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 21:46:54 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc:     Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
        jgg@ziepe.ca, jsnitsel@redhat.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
        oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
        peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        linux@mniewoehner.de, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com,
        p.rosenberger@kunbus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm, tpm_tis: Handle interrupt storm
Message-ID: <20230523194654.GB5820@wunner.de>
References: <20230522143105.8617-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
 <CSTVVFNKUVJW.P69FKI6IF3ZN@suppilovahvero>
 <CSTW066CTZ5M.2JR61D32CFSZL@suppilovahvero>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CSTW066CTZ5M.2JR61D32CFSZL@suppilovahvero>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:00:10PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> I feel also a bit resistant because leaf driver framework is really
> a wrong location in the kernel tree for IRQ storm detection.
> 
> It would be better to have it signaled above the TPM driver, and the
> driver would then just act on it.

That would require changing the logic in kernel/irq/spurious.c.

At this point in the cycle, such a change would definitely not be
eligible as a fix for v6.4.

Thanks,

Lukas