Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 09:38:44 +0200
From:   Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= <thomas@t-8ch.de>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tools/nolibc: stack protector compatibility fixes
Message-ID: <cb3f0f8f-f067-450f-8d5b-9a1ad2a2cd7f@t-8ch.de>
References: <20230523-nolibc-stackprotector-gcc9-v1-0-3e4804235d50@weissschuh.net>
 <ZG2+QuD/tVDqyMyb@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZG2+QuD/tVDqyMyb@1wt.eu>
Precedence: bulk

On 2023-05-24 09:35:30+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 08:44:41AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Two fixes for nolibc to
> > * allow users to explicitly disable (or theoretically enable) when
> >   building the tests
> > * fix stackprotectors on GCC < 10.
> 
> Nice, thank you. Just tested with gcc 9.5, works both with and without
> stkp. Now pushed to branch 20230524-nolibc-rv32+stkp4. I've dropped my
> exp patch and the associated revert. I think your two patches that clean
> up the makefile options and the new one here that restores the cflags
> should be squashed since the latter just partially reverts the former,
> and that way the series remains bisectable. Just let me know if you're
> OK, I can just to that and re-push.

Sounds good to me!

Thomas