Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753738AbXJJLNT (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:13:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751342AbXJJLNK (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:13:10 -0400 Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.94.6]:23685 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807AbXJJLNJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:13:09 -0400 Message-ID: <470CB3BF.2040904@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:13:03 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070607) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Engelhardt CC: Alexey Dobriyan , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Rebe?= , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23 References: <200710100944.16378.rene@exactcode.de> <470C977E.6010704@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 OpenPGP: id=4F9CF57E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1665 Lines: 39 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Oct 10 2007 14:36, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >>>>> --- linux-2.6.23/include/linux/mm.h.vanilla >>>>> +++ linux-2.6.23/include/linux/mm.h >>>>> +struct super_block; >>>>> extern void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *); >>>>> void drop_pagecache(void); >>>>> void drop_slab(void); >>>>> >>>>> You probably end up fixing it some other way, but as I do not know this >>>>> file inside out I just wanted to drop a note. >>>> You have some strange vanilla kernel. 2.6.23 doesn't have this prototype. >>> The same happens here as well. >>> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 mjt mjt 45488158 Oct 9 20:48 linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 >>> 2cc2fd4d521dc5d7cfce0d8a9d1b3472 linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 >>> >>> (timestamp is in UTC) Downloaded yesterday, 3 hours after an announce, >>> from http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 . >> Strange. Same size, same md5, no super_block in mm.h, though > > Does someone still have the broken tarball? > > There has not been any drop_pagecache_sb anytime between 2.6.23-rc1 > and 2.6.23. drop_pagecache_sb reminds me of reiser4, too. ghhrm. That's nonsense. I found where that struct super_block come from -- it's from unionfs patches for 2.6.22, which I forgot to update for 2.6.23 (I just dropped new kernel tarball into my build directory together with other patches and ran usual build procedure). It's a definitely false alarm - the tarball is fine. /mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/