Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <18a8528d-7d9d-6ed0-0045-5ee47dd39fb2@foss.st.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 16:01:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] tee: Re-enable vmalloc page support for shared
 memory
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
References: <20230523091350.292221-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
 <20230523091350.292221-2-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
 <ZG2yw0xZ6XGGp9E5@infradead.org>
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Organization: STMicroelectronics
In-Reply-To: <ZG2yw0xZ6XGGp9E5@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hello Christoph,

On 5/24/23 08:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:13:47AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> This patch revert commit c83900393aa1 ("tee: Remove vmalloc page support")
> 
> As per the discussion back then: don't just blindly do the same dumb
> thing again and fix the interfae to actually pass in a page array,
> or iov_iter or an actually useful container that fits.
> 

I suppose your are speaking about this discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221002002326.946620-3-ira.weiny@intel.com/

If I'm not mistaken, I should modify at tee_shm_register_kernel_buf API and
register_shm_helper inernal function, right?

Seems that Jens has also pointed out the free part...

What about having equivalent of shm_get_kernel_pages in an external helper (to
defined where to put it), could it be an alternative of the upadate of the
tee_shm API?

Thanks,
Arnaud