Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756808AbXJJQFn (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:05:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755157AbXJJQFg (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:05:36 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:53219 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754878AbXJJQFf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:05:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:05:08 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Mel Gorman , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, clameter@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask Message-ID: <20071010160508.GE26472@us.ibm.com> References: <20070928142326.16783.98817.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20070928142526.16783.97067.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20071009011143.GC14670@us.ibm.com> <20071009154052.GC12632@skynet.ie> <1192031620.5617.39.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1192031620.5617.39.camel@localhost> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.22.6 (x86_64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1868 Lines: 47 On 10.10.2007 [11:53:40 -0400], Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 16:40 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > ==== > > Subject: Use specified node ID with GFP_THISNODE if available > > > > It had been assumed that __GFP_THISNODE meant allocating from the local > > node and only the local node. However, users of alloc_pages_node() may also > > specify GFP_THISNODE. In this case, only the specified node should be used. > > This patch will allocate pages only from the requested node when GFP_THISNODE > > is used with alloc_pages_node(). > > > > [nacc@us.ibm.com: Detailed analysis of problem] > > Found-by: Lee Schermerhorn > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > > > > > Mel: I applied this patch [to your v8 series--the most recent, I > think?] and it does fix the problem. However, now I'm tripping over > this warning in __alloc_pages_nodemask: > > /* Specifying both __GFP_THISNODE and nodemask is stupid. Warn user */ > WARN_ON(gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE); > > for each huge page allocated. Rather slow as my console is a virtual > serial line and the warning includes the stack traceback. > > I think we want to just drop this warning, but maybe you have a tighter > condition that you want to warn about? Sigh, sorry Mel. I see this too on my box. I purely checked the functionality and didn't think to check the logs, as the tests worked :/ I think it's quite clear that the WARN_ON() makes no sense now, since alloc_pages_node() now calls __alloc_pages_nodemask(). -Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/