Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 15:53:55 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20230323072714.82289-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20230323072714.82289-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Message-ID: <ZG6Vg0RZhJLXxoFC@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: selftests: Test the consistency of the PMU's
 CPUID and its features
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, Like Xu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The KVM selfstests shows advantages over the KUT in terms of finding
> defects through flexible and varied guest settings form KVM user space.
> 
> This patch set tests whether Intel vPMU works properly with different
> Intel CPUID.0xA configurations, in which three issues were identified.
> It also provides test scaffolding and a sufficient number of pmu test cases
> to subsequently provide adequate code coverage of AMD vPMU or Intel
> complex features such as LBR or PEBS in selftests.
> 
> Please feel free to add more tests or share valuable comments.
> 
> Related bugs:
> KVM: x86/pmu: Fix emulation on Intel counters' bit width
> (https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230322093117.48335-1-likexu@tencent.com/)
> KVM: x86/pmu: Add Intel PMU supported fixed counters bit mask
> (https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230321112742.25255-1-likexu@tencent.com/)

Can you send a single combined series for these fixes, plus the tests in this
series?  I expect to apply the fixes before the tests, but I want to make it as
unlikely as possible that I forget and apply tests that fail.

Thanks!