Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 01:26:00 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] block: Use iov_iter_extract_pages() and page
 pinning in direct-io.c
Message-ID: <ZHBtGJ3SzJtr5HZP@infradead.org>
References: <20230525223953.225496-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
 <20230525223953.225496-4-dhowells@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230525223953.225496-4-dhowells@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:39:53PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Change the old block-based direct-I/O code to use iov_iter_extract_pages()
> to pin user pages or leave kernel pages unpinned rather than taking refs
> when submitting bios.
> 
> This makes use of the preceding patches to not take pins on the zero page
> (thereby allowing insertion of zero pages in with pinned pages) and to get
> additional pins on pages, allowing an extracted page to be used in multiple
> bios without having to re-extract it.

I'm not seeing where we skip the unpin of the zero page, as commented
in patch 1 (but maybe I'm not reviewing carefully enough as I'm at a
conference right now).

Otherwise my only rather cosmetic comment right now is that I'd called
the "need_unpin" member is_pinned.