Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <ee03b7ce-8257-17f9-f83e-bea2c64aff16@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 08:35:23 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230525214822.2725616-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20230525214822.2725616-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 5/25/23 3:48 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Jens, here's the full series of block layer patches needed for bcachefs:
> 
> Some of these (added exports, zero_fill_bio_iter?) can probably go with
> the bcachefs pull and I'm just including here for completeness. The main
> ones are the bio_iter patches, and the __invalidate_super() patch.
> 
> The bio_iter series has a new documentation patch.
> 
> I would still like the __invalidate_super() patch to get some review
> (from VFS people? unclear who owns this).

I wanted to check the code generation for patches 4 and 5, but the
series doesn't seem to apply to current -git nor my for-6.5/block.
There's no base commit in this cover letter either, so what is this
against?

Please send one that applies to for-6.5/block so it's a bit easier
to take a closer look at this.

-- 
Jens Axboe