Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 21:28:22 +0300
To:     Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com>
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        conor+dt@kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, jringle@gridpoint.com,
        tomasz.mon@camlingroup.com, l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add property to change
 GPIO function
Message-ID: <ZHD6Rps5laEYfut4@surfacebook>
References: <20230525040324.3773741-1-hugo@hugovil.com>
 <20230525040324.3773741-8-hugo@hugovil.com>
 <ZG9CWhiTbLBKjPC9@surfacebook>
 <20230525103443.d3d31e80221aed1ebceef30e@hugovil.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230525103443.d3d31e80221aed1ebceef30e@hugovil.com>
Precedence: bulk

Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:34:43AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve kirjoitti:
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 14:11:22 +0300
> andy.shevchenko@gmail.com wrote:
> > Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:03:21AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve kirjoitti:

...

> > I'm wondering if we can convert this to YAML first and then add a new
> > property.
> 
> I also thought about it, then decided to focus on simply adding the new
> property first since I am not an expert in YAML.
> 
> I think it would be best to do it after this patch series. Keep in mind that
> the original intent of this patch series, and this new property, was to fix a
> regression related to the GPIOs, and I think that converting to YAML would
> simply delay and add much noise to the discussion at this point.

The patch doesn't have Fixes tag, so it's definitely not a fix. Also new
property can fix a regression, it's impossible to fix the users' DTBs.

> If someone wants to do it as a separate patch after this, fine. If not, I an
> willing to give it a go.

Not a DT maintainer here, I'm fine with either way.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko