Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 19:54:17 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Tsahee Zidenberg <tsahee@annapurnalabs.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mah=E9?= Tardy <mahe.tardy@isovalent.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH stable 5.4 0/8] bpf: Fix
 bpf_probe_read/bpf_probe_read_str helpers
Message-ID: <2023052646-magnetize-equate-2b24@gregkh>
References: <20230522203352.738576-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230522203352.738576-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:33:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> we see broken access to user space with bpf_probe_read/bpf_probe_read_str
> helpers on arm64 with 5.4 kernel. The problem is that both helpers try to
> read user memory by calling probe_kernel_read, which seems to work on x86
> but fails on arm64.

Has this ever worked on arm64 for the 5.4 kernel tree?  If not, it's not
really a regression, and so, why not use a newer kernel that has this
new feature added to it there?

In other words, what requires you to use the 5.4.y tree and requires
feature parity across architectures?

thanks,

greg k-h