Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 16:44:25 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs
Message-ID: <ZHEaKQH22Uxk9jPK@moria.home.lan>
References: <20230525214822.2725616-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
 <ee03b7ce-8257-17f9-f83e-bea2c64aff16@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ee03b7ce-8257-17f9-f83e-bea2c64aff16@kernel.dk>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 08:35:23AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/25/23 3:48 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Jens, here's the full series of block layer patches needed for bcachefs:
> > 
> > Some of these (added exports, zero_fill_bio_iter?) can probably go with
> > the bcachefs pull and I'm just including here for completeness. The main
> > ones are the bio_iter patches, and the __invalidate_super() patch.
> > 
> > The bio_iter series has a new documentation patch.
> > 
> > I would still like the __invalidate_super() patch to get some review
> > (from VFS people? unclear who owns this).
> 
> I wanted to check the code generation for patches 4 and 5, but the
> series doesn't seem to apply to current -git nor my for-6.5/block.
> There's no base commit in this cover letter either, so what is this
> against?
> 
> Please send one that applies to for-6.5/block so it's a bit easier
> to take a closer look at this.

Here you go:
git pull https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git block-for-bcachefs

changed folio_vec to folio_seg, build tested it and just pointed my CI
at it, results will be showing up for xfs at
https://evilpiepirate.org/~testdashboard/ci?branch=block-for-bcachefs