Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757734AbXJKSyB (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:54:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753689AbXJKSxy (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:53:54 -0400 Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com ([17.148.16.74]:52150 "EHLO smtpoutm.mac.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752506AbXJKSxx (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:53:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <928423.71088.qm@web36604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <928423.71088.qm@web36604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7BC13842-3D05-4D80-B521-DD738FE4FB36@mac.com> Cc: Stephen Smalley , "Eric W. Biederman" , Alan Cox , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linus Torvalds , Bill Davidsen , James Morris , Andrew Morton , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kyle Moffett Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:53:17 -0400 To: casey@schaufler-ca.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1445 Lines: 33 On Oct 11, 2007, at 11:41:34, Casey Schaufler wrote: > --- Kyle Moffett wrote: >> [snipped] > > I'm still waiting to see the proposed SELinux policy that does what > Smack does. That *is* the SELinux policy which does what Smack does. I keep having bugs in the perl-script I'm writing on account of not having the time to really get around to fixing it, but that is exactly the procedure for generating an SELinux policy from a SMACK policy. > I can accept that you don't see anything that can't be implemented > thus, but that's not the point. You've provided some really clear > design notes, and that's great, but it ain't the code. You said > that you could write a 500 line perl script that would do the whole > thing, and that left some people with an impression that Smack is a > subset of SELinux. Well, I'm already finding myself digging out > from under that missunderstanding, and with people who are assuming > that your policy has been done, "proving" the point. I'd love to have time to finish the script but unfortunately real life keeps interfering and I'm going to have to go back to lurking on this thread. Cheers, Kyle Moffett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/