Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754997AbXJLCVT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:21:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753977AbXJLCVK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:21:10 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:16655 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753956AbXJLCVI (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:21:08 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,263,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="235279450" To: David Miller Cc: jeff@garzik.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <20071011.181719.78707713.davem@davemloft.net> From: Roland Dreier Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:21:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20071011.181719.78707713.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:17:19 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.20 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2007 02:21:06.0813 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B9E22D0:01C80C76] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1780 Lines: 38 > > This will get the batch of changes queued up for the 2.6.24 merge > > window (although I still have a few more things to merge later, once > > Dave Miller's networking tree has landed too): > > Roland are you absolutely sure this won't create merge conflicts with > my 8MB net-2.6 merge, inside of which there are many infiniband > driver changes? I'm not absolutely sure of anything but I have merged our two git trees quite a few times during the 2.6.23 cycle and I have not seen any conflicts. Unless you've added some more IB changes very recently I don't think there should be any problem. > I really wish you would submit your inifiniband work through normal > network driver channels, such as Jeff Garzik. Jeff has been syncing > on almost a daily basis with me so that I wouldn't have to worry about > changes coming out of left field and adding additional merge issues > for an already difficult merge. I'm not sure what you mean. During the 2.6.23 cycle I've been sending any patches that potentially could conflict with the net-2.6 tree to you and Jeff so that you can merge them upstream via your tree. Or do you mean Jeff should become the maintainer of drivers/infiniband?? Can't you guys just keep the networking stuff contained in its little box so it doesn't create maintenance problems for InfiniBand stuff? > Even if you're confident there won't be merge issues, could you just > wait for the net-2.6 stuff to go in first? I don't mind waiting but I guess it's up to Linus really. - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/