Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 18:50:25 -0400
Message-Id: <CSZ4NQFL3URD.I9QE8Q3018KI@Latitude-E6420>
Cc:     "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        "Andy Gross" <agross@kernel.org>,
        "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        "Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        "Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>,
        <soc@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Samsung Galaxy
 Express
From:   "Rudraksha Gupta" <guptarud@gmail.com>
To:     "Conor Dooley" <conor@kernel.org>
References: <20230527040905.stmnoshkdqgiaex6@ripper>
 <20230528001010.47868-2-guptarud@gmail.com>
 <20230528-decode-creasing-f5b3996163e5@spud>
 <ad7a6ee3-cabb-6f92-a595-8791801cfe97@gmail.com>
 <a8d3d68d-d202-ddba-3289-65b347807538@linaro.org>
 <CSZ46N3I9GM7.NON5KMJ66OK5@Latitude-E6420>
 <20230529-bonsai-during-37a47a528ff3@spud>
In-Reply-To: <20230529-bonsai-during-37a47a528ff3@spud>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon May 29, 2023 at 6:37 PM EDT, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:28:05PM -0400, Rudraksha Gupta wrote:
>
> > Gotcha, I will do that next time. Should I still send v2 in a separate
> > thread?
>
> That'd then be either [PATCH v3], or [RESEND PATCH v2]. Ideally v3 since
> you will have added the tags you received on v2.
> AFAIK Bjorn uses b4, which should be able to deal with the series as-is,
> but sending a v3 with the Acks etc would not be a bad idea. You
> should probably give it a couple days before doing that to see if it
> gets picked up before doing that.
>
> > Not sure if I should as I don't want to spam anyone.
>
> Sending new revisions of patches as a new thread is not spamming, we
> signed up to be maintainers, or get to email from the lists, after all.
> Sending several revisions of the same patches in a day would be spamming
> though, but that is not what we are talking about here ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.

Ah, I see. Thank you for being patient with me. I'm really excited to see m=
y
patch go in! :)