Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   gouhao@uniontech.com
To:     viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs/buffer: using __bio_add_page in submit_bh_wbc()
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 11:32:39 +0800
Message-Id: <20230530033239.17534-1-gouhao@uniontech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:uniontech.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz7a-0
Precedence: bulk

From: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com>

In submit_bh_wbc(), bio is newly allocated, so it
does not need any merging logic.

And using bio_add_page here will execute 'bio_flagged(
bio, BIO_CLONED)' and 'bio_full' twice, which is unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com>
---
 fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index a7fc561758b1..5abc26d8399d 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ static void submit_bh_wbc(blk_opf_t opf, struct buffer_head *bh,
 
 	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
 
-	bio_add_page(bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
+	__bio_add_page(bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
 	BUG_ON(bio->bi_iter.bi_size != bh->b_size);
 
 	bio->bi_end_io = end_bio_bh_io_sync;
-- 
2.20.1