Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp4396273rwd; Tue, 30 May 2023 05:03:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5HmzKK+nLYh0ZqqW0uZ7Jx/7qumRao8PEVwRzinY+dQh8AzCrhx1SP0vthLr5hbey8Cdab X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3707:b0:10d:f812:e4b5 with SMTP id yl7-20020a056a21370700b0010df812e4b5mr1736087pzb.35.1685448217873; Tue, 30 May 2023 05:03:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1685448217; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BNGKq4EZhZePYQvI8/T4A/gFqVcj41WDV7y0QJABO4s9F2GhrVsmcVA71jimTDuabQ k4X1Xq60nOOtZfyLK06eQixq5E4u4wFgVPBFqiebzOWo+WybMbjbromh6cC/zkgnwTU1 7l/8zRx1ICEP16RGVSLs+v9XUSBEwWeZdAuak2BEthtdAmiy6mjblf4ZlC7jHJG+YP1Q joW/aNUwNM9gcDDd3Xcayaf8ow2wnxypgcWHb4NwyYLP01qOEsWX4Dgsf4XqOmn0FaYj LCtEymyVGmngkPHzUU1hOQHfDxQKR7VVz9nq+me5fLNRjoMuazZiuznJgigo7TKwglBN FJNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=n3SnrrKqE4yPAFFtOXjSegDuG2HTryB+S9edl3vD0FI=; b=iveeFuOzkEvl0QfTRSDhw6sqyY8A9LgTe63Ng2wswlGZmP2xH2akiUjs/GMwE3/ARR GigQH8ENugHsYWArS9qXRF6oOLs2zNd1Kd/rLo4VODnpYkha87svlVSySMg7wedtXYeT cxrCxEekvYbqKA+LmXEnS+LEC+MSVbrz0kyE7TS/yeb8KbadJfylCSke0PkcnsufmgUN FL40c11VaXXup6ZjqZziTwKpnKu9NTDnJ9CpjVbLlZpnB2Pw7ZKZonx9IY51ruuNDj7+ HeQn2w0X/TWkwXbmgax4hCoHeXHM08QrTV6zjqiXqYKHuHCV+9bQJij319Yd8BKWTj+P V3Rg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=AO9jIJI5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 81-20020a621954000000b0063bcab61625si1604990pfz.178.2023.05.30.05.03.23; Tue, 30 May 2023 05:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=AO9jIJI5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231768AbjE3Lu7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 May 2023 07:50:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53508 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231247AbjE3Lu5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2023 07:50:57 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AB60F0; Tue, 30 May 2023 04:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C367762492; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53B71C433EF; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:50:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1685447455; bh=SViWi0+Y4kbgwEoqaRBIp7trJUsmkoHJ1///quKPNaU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=AO9jIJI5J2nA828jr2PkKwj+6C364JzJWqF8mpWKYd4CDfypOI+q3EM9k9worYCsA Un3WWEGUUzGQ0zX4LwJNNh8McRU3AU06GhIw4IyLfwQDN0YF19skoE3w9CXNhh+Ton yHdNp/RilsgzF8IOeV7cJEmXd9oXVc/gNpCun+3Mhf7Q6jLIPILsN2IgGHzarwUKwN VsGrMy5ljOsP2sqjt7lklXRlIUKM2QWYDP/KTb3qHGZ6KPiMZYO5NzkQyRIAiPTkdv CV5WzYCmE3oqGf7VP5a2rdncPzjxIwVFndN8in7O5J0Hj4eZ2cvanat7SiQshYT9WY 8NHBgqf4yC4sw== Message-ID: <1b4eba7e-2771-b0c8-ec23-2ed882374e5d@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 13:50:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add compatibility for TEE support To: Arnaud Pouliquen , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Jens Wiklander Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org References: <20230523091350.292221-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20230523091350.292221-4-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20230523091350.292221-4-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/05/2023 11:13, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > Rework compatibility description according to the support of > the authenticated firmware relying on OP-TEE authentication. > > The expected behavior is: > - with legacy compatible "st,stm32mp1-m4" the Linux kernel loads a > non-signed (ELF) firmware image, > - with compatible "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" the Linux kernel load a signed > firmware image. In this case it calls TEE services to manage the firmware > loading and the remoteproc life-cycle. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > --- > .../bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux kernel. You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested. Please resend and include all necessary entries. Because of above and RFC, I assume there is no need for review. Just to be clear - that's a no. Best regards, Krzysztof