Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <867dcc0a-c807-2851-e2c4-750a7646a97f@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 21:42:06 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] block: Fix the partition start may overflow in
 add_partition()
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
CC:     <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
        <yukuai3@huawei.com>
References: <20230525072041.3701176-1-zhongjinghua@huawei.com>
 <20230526053557.GA875@sol.localdomain>
From:   zhongjinghua <zhongjinghua@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230526053557.GA875@sol.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


在 2023/5/26 13:35, Eric Biggers 写道:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 03:20:41PM +0800, Zhong Jinghua wrote:
>> +	if (p.start < 0 || p.length <= 0 || p.start + p.length < 0)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
> Were zero-length partitions allowed before?
Before this patch,  the io to the zero-length partition failed, I think 
it is meaningless, and it was fixed by the way
> - Eric