Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp4679087rwd; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:27:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4yuT7Fa8sOhgR/RvXslH/tj96S8mKvD3QdcUqiPIqZpiC0vfZn9cCiN745FNI4QGlskup1 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:14cb:b0:64e:bada:2411 with SMTP id w11-20020a056a0014cb00b0064ebada2411mr3350058pfu.25.1685460425826; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:27:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1685460425; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XuTOI0jt9qZ5EwzLd9tcwhspkNG3t1F7wnCd0OzU4v+sYmt4n8Kyo1SeQlMuv+4XQj MymNj4c3b+Z1kp5fdPv3c4FVAZiWPEqk/6RUUWcTSfARWVO80I2Jeavhr42YVGaF1lkP Wm1iCwWgeRmPrGU4aqc1iHNYTSoK59Zn7Nq24A+uZOcdW3P0tUeuVnA2OOh0mLIge+pk E2gdlFN//gYZ0uxTWiCtiPhbHuL06BCIUEMj149PFQvFfnH/+pVGeB2ThpYCXbAuqK9x Cokme8Er3h6AOuebVfo5eLUfeYxqD50Bs0LBofA77gmVJFw+UtO1I7+5swPPnAyTAvP3 dvxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=2+AxHmvLd+v1CgnD9I3rfm9jRyc0x6nZihVafcxl41w=; b=lFaK8Pc1irjDbxUTIvGmi8D7el4NWXsHO/VVNpCRIvYrOoaE5WI6fmg13vPfEgGztS 8sHmiC17zVRR88w/VNeg2hBGB7kpzGgDVoT1iPuVkLPPtxJMdzz3FLt5wM0iIxYx4dMW BQJH2IUI0r7SV/J813vzZ4+drkzuI2YqqaFTk3FItUUAi6XZsa19gCmGR7s+fXFp6+mo jOzfEEv2r1UZx0sr9So3tkp+qRyfGGBy4V1GVV0Ntc2U5eCGb6xqmLnPiYd8lfty7fXe 5PJU+T/W4AFjiMLjXJHnkNN+5Vle6HVigapzIrzNPhEtIO4w8yPGnoAn18rt7xCi7kx/ DcSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=G0Jabv36; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 17-20020a630211000000b0053f9a37184bsi1560350pgc.772.2023.05.30.08.26.48; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=G0Jabv36; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233208AbjE3PMm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 May 2023 11:12:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48852 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233184AbjE3PMh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2023 11:12:37 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 210A5BE; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F9462906; Tue, 30 May 2023 15:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C417FC433EF; Tue, 30 May 2023 15:12:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1685459555; bh=4kszkiKYQZZBlC9XFCYpDiNYoZ19gI+fLwDPLNndKzU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=G0Jabv367okXjl+PR0dnMMOSyHI2z+LaykTYgyjXEbYiilKX+419JA7ARffaR9t3M 7cMpsTljIe7hGzmFHVwwoOjLJXsexJP6f7vKSKbG/cs5qyGAuOnkpI5SCdxvSnXk9x RYzAccWTtYwzSChWOR9HXWuRkXSs/38eAOUWd1ortKwryWdX1lWcZySyCoiZCKQdtE Sry3mSrPcmr/QRG4P/80TCJV+yW6/UTJTZTMrOtkDIBz+3EUrfFRbH3qXe6hou2apm 6BHkjatycqfh/rPqPiMeEZlVC8P4yJdZkrjmMLsqE0QzsAxExeBVBq8uZOJtVVBc8Q RpQxhWY9/9jrA== Message-ID: <7bdb0e44-eaf7-8085-2ea5-6bb06b01ef35@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 17:12:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add compatibility for TEE support Content-Language: en-US To: Arnaud POULIQUEN , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Jens Wiklander Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org References: <20230523091350.292221-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20230523091350.292221-4-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <1b4eba7e-2771-b0c8-ec23-2ed882374e5d@kernel.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30/05/2023 17:00, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 5/30/23 13:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 23/05/2023 11:13, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: >>> Rework compatibility description according to the support of >>> the authenticated firmware relying on OP-TEE authentication. >>> >>> The expected behavior is: >>> - with legacy compatible "st,stm32mp1-m4" the Linux kernel loads a >>> non-signed (ELF) firmware image, >>> - with compatible "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" the Linux kernel load a signed >>> firmware image. In this case it calls TEE services to manage the firmware >>> loading and the remoteproc life-cycle. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen >>> --- >>> .../bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people >> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older >> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base >> your patches on recent Linux kernel. >> >> You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested. >> Please resend and include all necessary entries. >> >> Because of above and RFC, I assume there is no need for review. Just to >> be clear - that's a no. > > I did not add DT list and maintainers intentionally to avoid that you > review it. > As in a first step the associated OP-TEE pull request has to be reviewed. > And my plan was just to share the Linux implementation part until the > OP-TEE review cycle is finished. Sure, that's fine. I just don't know whether this is intentional or not. Many people skip list without such reason... > > Now regarding your mail (and very interesting feedback from Christoph Hellwig), > it was clearly not the good strategy. > So my apologize and next time whatever the objective of the series I will add > all peoples and lists in the loop. No worries! Thanks. Best regards, Krzysztof