Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760514AbXJLKBf (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:01:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759431AbXJLKB1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:01:27 -0400 Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:54849 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750906AbXJLKB0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:01:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:04:18 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Nick Piggin Cc: Helge Hafting , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 3/3] x86: optimise barriers Message-ID: <20071012100418.GE1962@ff.dom.local> References: <20071012082534.GB1962@ff.dom.local> <470F337A.9090205@aitel.hist.no> <20071012091213.GC1962@ff.dom.local> <20071012094427.GC19237@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071012094427.GC19237@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 652 Lines: 15 On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:44:27AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: ... > So unless there is reasonable information for us to believe this > will be a problem, IMO the best thing to do is stick with the > specs. Intel is pretty reasonable with documenting errata I think. 100% right - if there are any specs. But it seems for a few years this spec was missing or there is some change of mind, I presume? Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/