Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 17:31:15 +0200
From:   Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/imx-gpt: Use only a single name for
 functions
Message-ID: <20230530153115.fpjgg6ubqjrbn73r@pengutronix.de>
References: <20230328091514.874724-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45ksup5wl6ujl7av"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230328091514.874724-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk


--45ksup5wl6ujl7av
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Helo Daniel,

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote:
> When looking at the data structs defining the different behaviours of
> the GPT blocks in different SoCs it's not helpful that the same
> functions are used with different names.
>=20
> So drop the cpp defines and use the original names.
>=20
> This commit was generated using:
>=20
> 	perl -i -e 'my %m; while (<>) { if (/^#define (imx[a-zA-Z0-6_]*)\s(imx[a=
-zA-Z0-6_]*)/) {$m{$1} =3D $2; } else { foreach my $f (keys %m) {s/$f/$m{$f=
}/; } print; } }' drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c
>=20
> This patch has no effect on the generated code.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

This patch was generated against v6.3-rc1. On the upside it still
applies fine to v6.4-rc1 and even current next/master. On the downside I
didn't get any feedback on it. Is this patch still on your radar?

Best regards
Uwe

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

--45ksup5wl6ujl7av
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmR2FsMACgkQj4D7WH0S
/k7tDgf+Ps4cKXwCQQ104nlF6rNbXfTYDedYM2GQlYd5awgX6F5ZpHBswAhZsSER
lzyAkAsTJyEY8IoUBFO9X8q+85itCr59Qz+1kHW6AVuf81T7R0QWAiXBHN+Xiu8Q
6rRgvyPjpvSN9MSxW/1uzOzBztjiLltksqfHr6DOgIn1Z2mEstIEPjlsS+wzv71m
28k4Byldr04qPkNeO7a3KiMOSUKzth6mGJZMmSjoJnYCBUIEuAupKs/95UgGw+4H
BMpjZhSzH2RTMK0MOmz9O2HHS1uw0idx/QxOuZM+AXouDYey9oSFP15V1vbCF7BZ
kzxcntMpvAADrevB0n1Uq68ufem4xA==
=5Mdu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--45ksup5wl6ujl7av--