Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760945AbXJLNBW (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:01:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758822AbXJLNBG (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:01:06 -0400 Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:52833 "EHLO sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756822AbXJLNBD (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:01:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:01:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Al Boldi cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , kaber@trash.net Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table In-Reply-To: <200710120031.42805.a1426z@gawab.com> Message-ID: References: <200710120031.42805.a1426z@gawab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 16 On Oct 12 2007 00:31, Al Boldi wrote: > >With the existence of the mangle table, how useful is the filter table? A similar discussion was back in March 2007. http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=117394977210823&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=117400063907706&w=2 in the end, my proposal was something like http://jengelh.hopto.org/GFX0/nf_proposal2.svg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/