Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 19:30:19 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs
Message-ID: <ZHaHC63OG+Q0N9wM@moria.home.lan>
References: <20230525214822.2725616-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
 <ee03b7ce-8257-17f9-f83e-bea2c64aff16@kernel.dk>
 <ZHEaKQH22Uxk9jPK@moria.home.lan>
 <8e874109-db4a-82e3-4020-0596eeabbadf@kernel.dk>
 <ZHYfGvPJFONm58dA@moria.home.lan>
 <2a56b6d4-5f24-9738-ec83-cefb20998c8c@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2a56b6d4-5f24-9738-ec83-cefb20998c8c@kernel.dk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:50:55AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Sorry typo, I meant text. Just checked stack and it looks identical, but
> things like blk-map grows ~6% more text, and bio ~3%. Didn't check all
> of them, but at least those two are consistent across x86-64 and
> aarch64. Ditto on the data front. Need to take a closer look at where
> exactly that is coming from, and what that looks like.

Weird - when I looked kernel text size was unchanged, it was data that
increased with the earlier version of the patch due to a new WARN_ON().
I'll have another look.