Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 11:58:21 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        mikelley@microsoft.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] x86/mtrr: fix handling with PAT but without MTRR
Message-ID: <20230531095821.GBZHcaPUvp8jo/IwV7@fat_crate.local>
References: <20230509201437.GFZFqprc6otRejDPUt@fat_crate.local>
 <20230509233641.GGZFrZCTDH7VwUMp5R@fat_crate.local>
 <20230510133024.GBZFuccC1FxIZNKL+8@fat_crate.local>
 <4c47a11c-0565-678d-3467-e01c5ec16600@suse.com>
 <20230511163208.GDZF0YiOfxQhSo4RDm@fat_crate.local>
 <0cd3899b-cf3b-61c1-14ae-60b6b49d14ab@suse.com>
 <20230530152825.GAZHYWGXAp8PHgN/w0@fat_crate.local>
 <888f860d-4307-54eb-01da-11f9adf65559@suse.com>
 <20230531083508.GAZHcGvB68PUAH7f+a@fat_crate.local>
 <7e824a95-6676-9553-4158-d434f617fcbb@suse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7e824a95-6676-9553-4158-d434f617fcbb@suse.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:31:37AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> What it did would have been printed if pr_debug() would have been
> active. :-(

Lemme turn those into pr_info(). pr_debug() is nuts.

> Did you check whether CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER_ENABLE_DEFAULT was the same in both
> kernels you've tested?

Yes, it is enabled.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette