Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 16:51:20 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To:     Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Type aware module allocator
Message-ID: <20230531135120.GA395338@kernel.org>
References: <20230526051529.3387103-1-song@kernel.org>
 <ZHGrjJ8PqAGN9OZK@moria.home.lan>
 <CAPhsuW4DAwx=7Nta5HGiPTJ1LQJCGJGY3FrsdKi62f_zJbsRFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230529104530.GL4967@kernel.org>
 <CAPhsuW6g98Wz9Oj1NiwwZ1OkSVNXX10USByY0b9tEfzOt8SVQg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW6g98Wz9Oj1NiwwZ1OkSVNXX10USByY0b9tEfzOt8SVQg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:37:24PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 3:45 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:58:37PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 12:04 AM Kent Overstreet
> > > <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think this needs to back to the drawing board and we need something
> > > > simpler just targeted at executable memory; architecture specific
> > > > options should definitely _not_ be part of the exposed interface.
> > >
> > > I don't think we are exposing architecture specific options to users.
> > > Some layer need to handle arch specifics. If the new allocator is
> > > built on top of module_alloc, module_alloc is handling that. If the new
> > > allocator is to replace module_alloc, it needs to handle arch specifics.
> >
> > I'm for creating a new allocator that will replace module_alloc(). This
> > will give us a clean abstraction that modules and all the rest will use and
> > it will make easier to plug binpack or another allocator instead of
> > vmalloc.
> >
> > Another point is with a new allocator we won't have weird dependencies on
> > CONFIG_MODULE in e.g. bpf and kprobes.
> >
> > I'll have something ready to post as an RFC in a few days.
> 
> I guess this RFC is similar to unmapped_alloc()? If it replaces
> vmalloc, we can probably trim this set down a bit (remove
> mod_alloc_params and vmalloc_params, etc.).

No, it's not a new allocator. I'm trying to create an API for code
allocations that can accommodate all the architectures and it won't be a
part of modules code. The modules will use the new API just like every
other subsystem that needs to allocate code.

I've got a core part of it here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=jitalloc/v1

and I hope I'll get it ready to post this week.

> Thanks,
> Song

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.