Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:29:51 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc:     Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>,
        "jsnitsel@redhat.com" <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "peterhuewe@gmx.de" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
        "jgg@ziepe.ca" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
Message-ID: <ZHhW_wFvRWInR_iM@orome>
References: <20230421091309.2672-1-kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
 <20230421091309.2672-3-kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
 <CS48A9Y752N4.QEM73WVMZYLQ@suppilovahvero>
 <3df39f0b-70dc-4b42-bae1-72c07607cbc7@sirena.org.uk>
 <ZEaWQD_QTs2usVl8@orome>
 <5fae29cd-d5f4-4616-be1c-1cd4d5b9a538@sirena.org.uk>
 <ZEag1lAonYcmNFXk@orome>
 <DM4PR12MB5769BB69B97F77DBA9ED2935C3779@DM4PR12MB5769.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <DM4PR12MB5769499349B6B936FE46BF0CC3419@DM4PR12MB5769.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tJDrl2ClcUSMc8xJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR12MB5769499349B6B936FE46BF0CC3419@DM4PR12MB5769.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10 (2023-03-25)
Precedence: bulk


--tJDrl2ClcUSMc8xJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:43:12PM +0000, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 8:41 PM
> > To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>; Mark Brown
> > <broonie@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>; jsnitsel@redhat.com;
> > robh+dt@kernel.org; peterhuewe@gmx.de; jgg@ziepe.ca;
> > krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; linux-spi@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > tegra@vger.kernel.org; linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>;
> > Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>; Laxman Dewangan
> > <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> > Subject: RE: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
> >=20
> >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: 24 April 2023 21:02
> > > To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>; Krishna Yarlagadda
> > > <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>; jsnitsel@redhat.com; robh+dt@kernel.org;
> > > peterhuewe@gmx.de; jgg@ziepe.ca; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
> > > linux-spi@vger.kernel.org; linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > > integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Hun=
ter
> > > <jonathanh@nvidia.com>; Sowjanya Komatineni
> > > <skomatineni@nvidia.com>; Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:46:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Would it make sense for you to pick up patch 2/3 as well? As far =
as I
> > > > > can tell there's a build dependency on patch 1/3 because of the n=
ewly
> > > > > added SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW symbol.
> > > >
> > > > I'll include it in my pull request for spi this time round so it sh=
ould
> > > > end up in -rc1, my thinking was that I was happy with the SPI bits =
and
> > > > if it was in -rc1 then the TPM bits could be handled without cross =
tree
> > > > issues when the review was sorted (which it is now but wasn't at the
> > > > time).  If the SPI side doesn't make -rc1 for some reason I can pic=
k up
> > > > the TPM bit as well, and/or do a signed tag.
> > >
> > > Sounds good.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thierry
> >=20
> > Mark,
> > Now that SPI changes are in, can we pull this TPM change for rc2.
> > Will this be picked into SPI or TPM list?
> Jarkko, Mark,
> Can we pick this change in TPM list since SPI header changes are in.

Hey Mark, Jarkko,

any ideas on how we can best get this merged? I guess at this point it
could go through either tree since the SPI dependency has been in Linus'
tree since v6.4-rc1.

Thierry

--tJDrl2ClcUSMc8xJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=SRF2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tJDrl2ClcUSMc8xJ--