Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <db32243e6cb70798edcf33a9d5c82a8c7ba556e2.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] sock: Remove redundant cond of memcg pressure
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To:     Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:10:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20230530114011.13368-5-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
References: <20230530114011.13368-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
         <20230530114011.13368-5-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 19:40 +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
> Now with the previous patch, __sk_mem_raise_allocated() considers
> the memory pressure of both global and the socket's memcg on a func-
> wide level,=C2=A0

Since the "previous patch" (aka "sock: Consider memcg pressure when
raising sockmem") has been dropped in this series revision, I guess
this patch should be dropped, too?

Is this targeting the 'net-next' tree or the 'net' one? please specify
the target tree into the subj line. I think we could consider net-next
for this series, given the IMHO not trivial implications.

Cheers,

Paolo