Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <f52a1dee-70f2-e3b4-4aa2-f591d7d8063e@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:52:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] devres: Provide krealloc_array
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>
References: <20230509094942.396150-1-james.clark@arm.com>
 <20230509094942.396150-2-james.clark@arm.com>
 <2023051340-sinuous-darkroom-2497@gregkh>
 <89ad5070-db72-7bf1-5d86-a89fea54e789@arm.com>
 <2023051530-immunize-pony-49ef@gregkh>
 <46bb773c-31a8-c57a-0cde-39c27d0a6e36@arm.com>
 <2023060104-removal-map-b194@gregkh>
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <2023060104-removal-map-b194@gregkh>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 01/06/2023 10:33, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:44:55PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> (Removed irrelevant recipients), +Cc: coresight ml
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 15/05/2023 12:55, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 08:55:33AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13/05/2023 12:04, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 10:49:38AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>>>>>> There is no krealloc_array equivalent in devres. Users would have to
>>>>>> do their own multiplication overflow check so provide one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/devres.rst |  1 +
>>>>>>    include/linux/device.h                           | 11 +++++++++++
>>>>>>    2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> Maybe something could be done with some macro magic, but it would
>>>> probably end up being worse than just copying them and would affect the
>>>> real ones as well. So yeah I can't think of any easy gains either.
>>>
>>> Ok, that's good.  Given a lack of objections from others, I'll just take
>>> this through my driver core tree in a few days.
>>
>> Apologies for hijacking the thread. We have a series for CoreSight[1]
>> that depends on this series, which I see that, is queued in your
>> driver-core-next.
>>
>> I would like to queue [1] for the next version (as there are other
>> work that depend on this, e.g., [2]). Do you have any
>> recommendations/comments on the proposal ? Are you able to share a
>> stable branch which can be merged to coresight/next and queue the
>> series ontop ? (PS: I haven't queued anything for coresight/next yet).
> 
> You can pull from my driver-core-next branch just fine and assume it
> will be stable.  So just pull in that one commit and all should be good
> in the future.

Thanks Greg, I will give it a go

Suzuki

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h