Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp660829rwd; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 05:11:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ68E+9WTayr1i8G/QcqDC1elpfqcFvl1d3SAp0LU8HvYVtJOwTFHFDvim2z6MqJY2/PfyF3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c20d:b0:1ac:6d4c:c24b with SMTP id 13-20020a170902c20d00b001ac6d4cc24bmr5500112pll.3.1685621488633; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 05:11:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1685621488; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0MnoBPxXPh52r6OPiTX3IA2dhN3wwa9mnZkMk08WHo7Md72NC2bs0u0wUu7U1n/RjM SuAdqNW3EmFWtj7d9KdE1Dbp1FW5IhqAWO3HXBm+H67wOwLIFjVG3/xwyiLMmaUsINeN 6q+Jw0yAzmmb/a4gOp3YwjY++rfpR7y+vNcjOECkKTaAhgw/Hw1+/DpKwYwQPNq3HBAD Wh8NCKUiougP5qOotg7w6wq8hDiGol+dBdATsgqP6k3PbvKgew4a3vrZGG8W4GUAPuzb 6kiUUmVRftX5u+C/ZUjSmtNrO/TUmz7Je24m6G5RoHRtAQ3RuaW3hQjJFpl3kfiqkOJg ywVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=KUMSQwbjndN9y0bHXAp/macV1LggNtVpmB6otmxbyMg=; b=ljxkdz7GmfESBSt8VShir+KVUbbaPZcPAbZBfrd1yzodCQus3gzd/P3Yr/4VFxXyyM mjZaqvZB67M4eLHNjLx+u++tKOlYDhQhnqUkKX3tHubisAb05Ri3vk7Hy0l7krvMrZss wAFRDGKUZ6HbyxWvJ4Uh24WMqZioyIQFAWkQyZUlezpzojO7GcqFNl7oeDHSpcy+Glfs Rc47wtj/L92JZOKYzWQfAZo1OAtOULebSkiCUvcn2pfCZCjehtY+HP1/ZVY8VqnvGq+w JDTS0PRHjOcwNXsIts7VqM2jU8AThJK8ZFObTjF7V/qVZtrGTeptXO7fYWImEC9Ad1Pz zeRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=FGJ5kEFZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3-20020a170903028300b001adb857fc79si2770563plr.105.2023.06.01.05.11.15; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 05:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=FGJ5kEFZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232288AbjFAL4y (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:56:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47336 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231651AbjFAL4x (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:56:53 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0A7AA; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 04:56:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=KUMSQwbjndN9y0bHXAp/macV1LggNtVpmB6otmxbyMg=; b=FGJ5kEFZ9Qidvkf/r42AyNan4h FzYOZPi7Pt7wD+f5MJO8wUvFK3eK0hCeUmYW9KmjOEsAsoCCgecIBWSMxsuocsqKb+uRZm+1Z/H7b 8UTuyPUSF+pPmQ8QO+Bn90+FLnsn5T8Tg+68LgK2rdBVU1BF6G3Oz9RdPDNzeapXNx/H0ZJgRgqA6 mxD0Icj8rFWN2OxVS2WqdUswBF6ObWs6Spy+8DUCMk4JaG1GPcvcj8HqXquHGLf10L9O5iHiE7S4c DPxeU5O66rQxL54KwAfsw4arCNjt/kxGszjTPzNGj/tzIi4Zr6/jLgUbGYAuRA148QfCi1i8ExyTL kjBkpuRg==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q4gv6-00H9MK-1l; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:56:44 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF501300220; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:56:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90255202BDCAC; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:56:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:56:43 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: K Prateek Nayak Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , x86@kernel.org, Gautham Shenoy Subject: Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Multi-LLC select_idle_sibling() Message-ID: <20230601115643.GX4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <168553468754.404.2298362895524875073.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <3de5c24f-6437-f21b-ed61-76b86a199e8c@amd.com> <20230601111326.GV4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230601111326.GV4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:13:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > This DeathStarBench thing seems to suggest that scanning up to 4 CCDs > isn't too much of a bother; so perhaps something like so? > > (on top of tip/sched/core from just a few hours ago, as I had to 'fix' > this patch and force pushed the thing) > > And yeah, random hacks and heuristics here :/ Does there happen to be > additional topology that could aid us here? Does the CCD fabric itself > have a distance metric we can use? https://www.anandtech.com/show/16529/amd-epyc-milan-review/4 Specifically: https://images.anandtech.com/doci/16529/Bounce-7763.png That seems to suggest there are some very minor distance effects in the CCD fabric. I didn't read the article too closely, but you'll note that the first 4 CCDs have inter-CCD latency < 100 while the rest has > 100. Could you also test on a Zen2 Epyc, does that require nr=8 instead of 4? Should we perhaps write it like: 32 / llc_size ? The Zen2 picture: https://images.anandtech.com/doci/16315/Bounce-7742.png Shows a more pronounced CCD fabric topology, you can really see the 2 CCX inside the CCD but also there's two ligher green squares around the CCDs themselves.