Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:41:14 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/42] 6.1.32-rc1 review
Message-ID: <2023060155-angles-baggy-78e5@gregkh>
References: <20230601131939.051934720@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYuHjNhe-5TboAbrOeZrL3xL-CYYSaEnL=8onebLUqDt8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <2023060101-coconut-smugness-4c7a@gregkh>
 <e7f9cbd1-f19d-2f08-8876-45163910ad93@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e7f9cbd1-f19d-2f08-8876-45163910ad93@roeck-us.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 07:39:54AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/1/23 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 07:41:08PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 18:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.32 release.
> > > > There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 03 Jun 2023 13:19:19 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > >          https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.32-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > >          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > greg k-h
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Following build errors noticed on 6.1 and 5.15.
> > > 
> > > drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c: In function 'atmel_xdmac_resume':
> > > drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c:2049:9: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'pm_runtime_get_noresume' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >   2049 |         pm_runtime_get_noresume(atxdmac->dev);
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c:2049:40: error: 'struct at_xdmac' has no member
> > > named 'dev'
> > >   2049 |         pm_runtime_get_noresume(atxdmac->dev);
> > >        |                                        ^~
> > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > 
> > > reported link:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYswtPyrYJbwcGFhc5o7mkRmWZEWCCeSjmR64M+N-odQhQ@mail.gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Ah, the .h file was added by 650b0e990cbd ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: add
> > runtime pm support"), which isn't needed here.  I'll go add it by hand
> 
> Really ? Some of the dma patches seem to fix runtime pm support, and
> "dmaengine: at_xdmac: disable/enable clock directly on suspend/resume"
> is even tagged with
> 
> Fixes: 650b0e990cbd ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: add runtime pm support")
> 
> Why do we need to fix code which isn't present in 6.1.y ?

We don't, I've dropped all of the patches for this driver from 5.15.y
and 6.1.y as something went wrong here.

thanks,

greg k-h