Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri,  2 Jun 2023 08:32:25 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20230601183002.237a31fa.gary@garyguo.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20230601183002.237a31fa.gary@garyguo.net>
Message-ID: <20230602083226.1034597-1-aliceryhl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] rust: workqueue: define built-in queues
From:   Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To:     gary@garyguo.net
Cc:     alex.gaynor@gmail.com, aliceryhl@google.com,
        benno.lossin@proton.me, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
        boqun.feng@gmail.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org,
        patches@lists.linux.dev, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
        tj@kernel.org, walmeida@microsoft.com, wedsonaf@gmail.com,
        yakoyoku@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> writes:
> On Thu,  1 Jun 2023 13:49:42 +0000
> Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
>> From: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
>> 
>> We provide these methods because it lets us access these queues from
>> Rust without using unsafe code.
>> 
>> These methods return `&'static Queue`. References annotated with the
>> 'static lifetime are used when the referent will stay alive forever.
>> That is ok for these queues because they are global variables and cannot
>> be destroyed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
> 
> This looks fine to me, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> 
> Just one question about style: would people prefer:
> 
> 	kernel::workqueue::system().enqueue(...)
> 
> or
> 
> 	use kernel::workqueue::Queue;
> 	Queue::system().enqueue(...)
> 
> ?

I prefer the first version.

Alice